We discuss the cynical use of Human Rights to advance US interests with guest Glenn Greenwald.
The conceit that the U.S. has been a dedicated and earnest promoter of “freedom”, “democracy,” and “human rights” throughout the world — even if,...
We discuss the cynical use of Human Rights to advance US interests with guest Glenn Greenwald.
The conceit that the U.S. has been a dedicated and earnest promoter of “freedom”, “democracy,” and “human rights” throughout the world — even if, at times, a “flawed” one — is a defining narrative, largely taken for granted by major media. But how accurate is this assumption? What do we mean when we talk about human rights? What abuses are highlighted and which aren’t? Where do labor rights fit into the broader discussion of human rights?
On this episode of Citations Needed, we attempt to parse some of these complex questions and how they fit into a broader discussions of soft power and war.
Es gibt die Hoffnung, dass eine Technologie der Zukunft die Klima-Probleme von heute auf beinahe magisch-mystische...
Es gibt die Hoffnung, dass eine Technologie der Zukunft die Klima-Probleme von heute auf beinahe magisch-mystische Weise lösen werde. In den Pariser Vereinbarungen ist die spekulative Hoffnung enthalten, dass die Menschheit eine Zaubermaschine entdecken möge.
Es gibt zwar längst wirksame Technologien, die den Stopp des menschengemachten Klimawandels bewirken könnten. Aber ihr Einsatz wäre nur ausreichend, wenn zugleich massive Einschnitte in den heute normalen, westlich-industriellen Lebenswandel stattfinden würden.
Die Technikgläubigkeit der Greta-Skeptiker ist kein euphorisch-positiver Technikglaube. Es handelt sich eher um eine Abwehrreaktion, die mit dem Joker Technologie operiert. Denn dahinter steht der schlichte wie technologieferne Wunsch, die anstrengende Veränderung noch ein wenig herauszuzögern.
Sascha Lobo stellt seinen Lesern die Frage: Und warum verehren Sie Greta? Die Antworten und Lobos Reaktionen darauf gibt es in dieser Episode.
“As homeless people turn off visitors, San Francisco tourism senses threat” notes Travelers Weekly. “Seattle Is...
“As homeless people turn off visitors, San Francisco tourism senses threat” notes Travelers Weekly. “Seattle Is Dying: Drugs And Homelessness In Seattle,” laments KOMO Seattle. “Austin veteran fights off alleged homeless attacker after offering to help him,” exclaims ABC-affiliate KVUE.
As housing costs skyrocket and inequality grows, homelessness is reaching crisis levels in large metropolitan areas. In response, the media––namely local news stations––routinely treat the homeless like an invading species, a vermin to be, at best, contained, and at worst eradicated.
The result has been a slew of stories pathologizing those experiencing homelessness as uniquely dangerous. Panhandlers are viewed as con men out to screw over the working man, chased down by vigilantes with the help of outraged local news “standing up” to the poor. The housing status of those who commit crimes is only mentioned when they’re homeless––never for the housed––and every transgression committed by the homeless is viewed by our media as evidence that the homeless population in general is out to attack us all.
But this narrative flies in the face of the evidence, and tracks––like most “crime coverage”––with the needs of real estate interests who set the tone for local media coverage, and who have every reason to highlight and oversell the threat of homeless to pressure lawmakers and police to displace “eye sores” for the yuppie clientele they’re attempting to sell and ultimately serve.